Comparing Major Linux Distributions: Based on Available Packages in Repositories
A key question to ask yourself when choosing a Linux distribution is: Which one has the most packages available in its repositories for installation? In other words, in which distribution do you have the most freedom to install various programs?
Giving a definitive answer to this question is very difficult. There are many reasons why a clear-cut answer isn’t possible, but I’ll list a few:
- In the
AUR, we don’t download ready-to-install packages; we only receive the installation instructions for them. - A high package count isn’t necessarily a good thing; the stability of the distribution is more important.
- Third-party repositories are not considered in this comparison because they are not easily quantifiable.
Ranking Based on Package Count in Repositories
1. Archlinux + AUR - The Unrivaled King
- Main Arch Linux repository: Approximately 15,000 high-quality and up-to-date packages.
AURrepository: A true giant with over 90,000 packages! Here, users upload build scripts (PKGBUILD) for almost any software you can imagine.- Thanks to the
AUR, almost any program is available for installation in the repositories, and you always get the latest version. This method keeps you constantly updated and gives you access to a world of packages, but the flip side is that your system may become unstable due to using these packages.
2. Fedora + RPM Fusion - The Balanced Choice
- Main repository: About 60,000 tested and secure packages.
- By enabling the
RPM Fusionrepository, you enter a world of installable packages. - Unlike the
AUR,RPM Fusionprovides pre-compiled binaries instead of source-based packages, meaning faster and easier package installation.
3. openSUSE + OBS - The Most Management Tools
- The main openSUSE repository has about 20,000 stable packages.
- By enabling
OBS(Open Build Service), you gain access to over 125,000 packages. OBSdoesn’t work in a centralized manner like theAUR. You need to manually add repositories to your system by searching on its website or using tools.
4. Ubuntu + PPA - Convenience at the Cost of Fragmentation
- Main repository: Between 60,000 to 70,000 packages.
- Personal Package Archives (
PPA) are created and maintained by users. You have to search for them. The trustworthiness, currency, and security of PPAs are not uniform and can vary greatly.
5. Debian - Complete Stability
- Main repository: 64,000 secure and thoroughly tested packages.
- Packages are rigorously tested for compatibility and security.
- Other software must be compiled manually.
Summary
Based on Package Count in Repositories
| Distribution | Main Repo | Supplementary Repo | Total Accessible Packages | Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arch | Medium (~15k) | AUR (Largest ~90k+) | 100,000+ | Latest versions, comprehensiveness | Requires more technical knowledge |
| Fedora | Large (~60k) | RPM Fusion (Very Large) | ~80,000+ | Excellent balance between new and stable | Requires enabling an additional repo |
| openSUSE | Medium (~20k) | OBS (Very Large ~125k) | ~140,000+ | Excellent tools, stable | Lower popularity, fewer Persian resources |
| Ubuntu | Very Large (from Debian) | PPAs (Fragmented) | Unspecified (Very High) | Large community, abundant guides | Inconsistent PPA quality |
| Debian | Very Large (~64k) | Very Limited | ~64,000 (Stable) | Unparalleled stability & security | Older software versions |
Which Distribution is Right for You?
| Distribution | Key to Accessing the Software World | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Arch Linux | AUR (Over 90k packages) | Technology seekers, customization enthusiasts, those who want the latest versions. |
| Fedora | Main repo + RPM Fusion | Those seeking balance between up-to-date software and system stability. |
| openSUSE | Main repo + OBS | Professional users who need power, excellent management tools, and extensive, high-quality repositories. |
| Ubuntu | Main repo + PPAs | Beginners and those who prefer convenience, extensive support, and abundant tutorials. |
| Debian | Main repo only (Stable) | Server administrators and those who prioritize stability and security over everything else—even being up-to-date. |
| [file content end] |